我以前提過牙牌籤的歌訣：
全副牙牌一字排，中間看有幾多開，此歌訣最令人不解的地方，在於如何將排成一行的天九牌分組。原來有舊文獻曾解釋這點，詳見經過大幅修改後的《也談張愛玲的牙牌籤》。
連排三次分明記，上下中平內取裁。
2009年11月26日星期四
六虎與牙牌籤
電鋸來郵問我曉不曉客家六虎牌。我這個生於斯長於斯的香港人，雖然於九七後無奈地覺得自己變了客家，可是卻不懂客家牌。本着好奇心，我翻書看看有無有關記載，誰知六虎牌翻不着，反而意外地解開了之前一個有關牙牌籤的謎團。
我以前提過牙牌籤的歌訣：
我以前提過牙牌籤的歌訣：
Label(s)：
傳統遊藝（天九、馬弔、麻雀 …）
2009年11月24日星期二
2009年11月18日星期三
Re: constitutional reform
Dear Donald,
>>> Donald Tsang<http://www.news.gov.hk/en/category/administration/091118/html/091118en01004.htm> 18/11/2009 >>>
> We must take the Hong Kong people's aspirations to heart.
Agree. Please tell Beijing to do the same.
> This is time for all of us to focus on the overall interests and long-term development of Hong Kong.
Overall interests ... defined by whom? You are being ambiguous here.
> This is a time for seeking consensus, not differences.
If you really want to convey consensus, why don't you organise a referendum (or a vote of preference, if that matters)? Constitutional reform is no ordinary subject. Twelve years have passed. We still don't see any sign of getting a genuine universal suffrage of Chief Executive (and Legco members). The people of Hong Kong deserve the right to express their preferences in this matter.
> This is a time to abandon impractical demands.
Why is universal suffrage of CE in 2012 impractical? Is it becausethe apocalypse will arrive and we will be busy rushing into the arks built by People's Liberation Army but have no leisure time to play election games?
Please don't disguise the decision of the Standing Committee of NPC as an explanation. That Beijing doesn't like it is one thing, whether it is practical is another. As the chief executive of HK government, you should demand Beijing to explain why universal suffrage in 2012 is impractical.
> This is a time for rational and open discussions.
Asking for universal suffrage in the near term is not irrational. Banning it without any reason is. Just stop playing rhetoric and tell Beijing to become more rational.
> This is a time that we move forward.
The people of Hong Kong always try to do that. But Beijing prevents us from doing so. Now it is time for you to step forward and convince Beijing to move forward.
Best regards,
The suffocated
>>> Donald Tsang
> We must take the Hong Kong people's aspirations to heart.
Agree. Please tell Beijing to do the same.
> This is time for all of us to focus on the overall interests and long-term development of Hong Kong.
Overall interests ... defined by whom?
> This is a time for seeking consensus, not differences.
If you really want to convey consensus, why don't you organise a referendum (or a vote of preference, if that matters)? Constitutional reform is no ordinary subject. Twelve years have passed. We still don't see any sign of getting a genuine universal suffrage of Chief Executive (and Legco members). The people of Hong Kong deserve the right to express their preferences in this matter.
> This is a time to abandon impractical demands.
Why is universal suffrage of CE in 2012 impractical? Is it because
Please don't disguise the decision of the Standing Committee of NPC as an explanation. That Beijing doesn't like it is one thing, whether it is practical is another. As the chief executive of HK government, you should demand Beijing to explain why universal suffrage in 2012 is impractical.
> This is a time for rational and open discussions.
Asking for universal suffrage in the near term is not irrational. Banning it without any reason is. Just stop playing rhetoric and tell Beijing to become more rational.
> This is a time that we move forward.
The people of Hong Kong always try to do that. But Beijing prevents us from doing so. Now it is time for you to step forward and convince Beijing to move forward.
Best regards,
The suffocated
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)